|
In effect,
the Post argued that people of faith and moral conviction have no
place in the public square -- at least not on this issue. And the
editorial's allusions to the tortures of the Inquisition recall
the kind of Know Nothing bigotry perfected by the Ku Klux Klan.
It's bad journalism. It's unworthy of the Post's normally decent
standards. The people of Colorado deserve better from a major daily
newspaper.
Let's be clear
on this: Catholics do indeed oppose medical research that requires
the destruction of human embryos. Millions of other Americans, religious
and otherwise, share this moral conviction. We emphatically support
science and medical advances -- but we oppose the use of
immoral means to achieve seemingly good goals, even when they include
possible medical cures.
Why? Because
if the bloody legacy of the last century has taught us anything,
it's that the end never justifies the means.
The immorality
of destroying human embryos does not rest on what the Post termed
a "rigid postulate". Rather, the sacredness of human life
is the constant teaching of the Christian faith from the Didache
of the first century through Vatican II. Two statements from the
Catechism of the Catholic Church make this teaching clear.
"The
inalienable rights of the person must be recognized and respected
by civil society and the political authority. … Among such fundamental
rights one should mention in this regard every human being’s
right to life and physical integrity from the moment of conception
until death." (2273)
"Since
it must be treated from conception as a person, the embryo must
be defended in its integrity, cared for, and healed, as far
as possible, like any other human being." (2274)
In
the face of this teaching, the Post and others attempt to dehumanize
embryos by calling them "microscopic clumps of cells"
or by insisting that they are "unneeded." But these microscopic
clumps of cells are genetically complete and unique human individuals.
Their tiny size does not diminish their humanity -- by exactly that
same bad logic, an infant would be less human than an adult. In
fact, all of us were once the same size on our journey through
the continuum of human life.
The term "unneeded"
is also quite curious. It reveals a utilitarian ethic that denies
human dignity and treats people as objects to be manipulated. Practitioners
of this ethic were tried as war criminals less than 60 years ago.
Today, they promise miracle cures while ignoring a constant principle
of morality -- we may never do evil so that good may result from
it. The cures promised are hypothetical, but even if real, they
can never justify the evil of embryo destruction.
Does fidelity
to sound moral principles leave us without hope of medical advances?
Not at all. Stem cells derived from adult tissue and from the placenta
after childbirth have produced promising results, even while the
use of embryonic cells to treat Parkinson's Disease patients has
proved disappointing. And non-embryonic stem cells can be acquired
through entirely moral means.
This is a matter
of enormous importance. Let President Bush and your congressional
representatives know your convictions -- and equally important,
let's pray for them daily, that the Lord will lead them to see and
do what is right.
|