| Listen to these
opening lines from Gaudium et Spes: "The joy and hope, the grief
and anguish of the men of our time, especially of those who are poor
or afflicted in any way, are the joy and hope, the grief and anguish
of the followers of Christ as well. Nothing that is genuinely human
fails to find an echo in [the] hearts" of the disciples of Jesus
and this is "why Christians cherish a feeling of deep
solidarity with the human race and its history." And later in
the same text, listen to these words: " . . . Christians can
yearn for nothing more ardently than to serve the men of this age
with an ever-growing generosity and success."
Gaudium et Spes is the best argument for the dignity of the human
person; for economic and social justice; for true peace and development,
that's been written in the last 100 years. And it provides us with
an "examination of conscience" we can apply to just about
every aspect of our lives our personal choices, our parishes,
our business activity, our political leaders, everything. For example:
Do we reverence and defend the dignity of the human person from
conception to natural death?
Do we really love our enemies? Do we even try?
Do we teach our children to take responsibility for society, and
to participate in building up the common good? Do we teach that
by our own good example?
Do we preach, by our actions, the dignity of human labor and the
value of human activity? Do we live our lives with a purpose
the purpose of co-creating with God a truly human world, a world
shaped by the Gospel, a "new heaven and new earth"?
Do we promote the nobility of marriage and the sanctity of the family?
Do we work to ensure that our art, science, technology, music, law,
entertainment media all the elements of our culture
advance the real dignity of women and men?
Do we practice justice in our own social and economic relationships?
Do we really try to root out the prejudices in our own hearts? And
do we encourage justice in our friends, business associates and
leaders?
Do we take an active hand in the political process? Do we demand
that our officials promote the sanctity of the human person? And
do we do everything in our power to correct or replace them if they
don't?
Finally, do we create in ourselves and in our children a sense of
international community? The word "Catholic" means universal.
We live most of our lives in our families and parishes and
that's where our first priorities should always lie. But there's
no such thing as a "parochial" Catholic. We're all internationalists.
That's why issues like hunger, economic development, the rights
of migrant workers, religious persecution even when they're
happening on the other side of the world, they're happening to our
brothers and sisters in the Lord. And so they involve us.
As Christians in the world, we have a sacred responsibility to the
world to be in the world as agents of the Gospel. We think
too little of ourselves when we assume that we were made for nothing
better than the "present arrangement" of things. We should
never be slaves to the present arrangement. God put us here to be
agents of change. Woody Allen once said that "80 percent of
life is just showing up." He's funny but he's wrong.
That's a life 80 percent wasted, because there's so much need in
the world crying out to be heard.
There's a Ghanaian proverb that goes like this: "God swats
the flies of the cow with no tail." It means that God takes
care of the poor, because the poor don't have the power to take
care of themselves. That's why the Church has a "preferential
option for the poor." If God loves and serves the poor, then
how can we do anything else? And if that requires political action,
so be it.
Archbishop Desmond Tutu once said, "I'm puzzled about which
Bible people are reading when they suggest that religion and politics
don't mix." And the great Protestant theologian, Karl Barth,
once said that, "To clasp hands in prayer is the beginning
of an uprising against the world." And Vatican II never said,
and never meant, that Christians should let the world go to hell
because of some mistaken idea of good manners.
|